Christeson v. Roper

Supreme Court of the United States
Christeson v. Roper, 135 S. Ct. 14 (2014)
190 L. Ed. 2d 322; 83 U.S.L.W. 3264; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 7179

Christeson v. Roper

Opinion of the Court

UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicant and the response filed thereto,

IT IS ORDERED that the parties are directed to file supplemental briefs by 2:00 pm today, October, 28, 2014, regarding whether the record shows that petitioner has authorized Attorney Jennifer A. Merrigan, or Attorney John R. Mills, or Attorney Joseph J. Perkovich to move on his behalf for substitution of counsel appointed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599.

Reference

Full Case Name
Mark A. CHRISTESON, Applicant v. Don ROPER, Warden.
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published