Supreme Court of the United States, 2014

Honesto v. California

Honesto v. California
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 6, 2014
135 S. Ct. 172; 190 L. Ed. 2d 12; 83 U.S.L.W. 3194; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 6399 (Supreme Court Reporter)

Honesto v. California

Opinion of the Court

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisdenied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992)(per curiam).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.