Dydzak v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of Cal.

Supreme Court of the United States
Dydzak v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of Cal., 134 S. Ct. 988 (2014)
187 L. Ed. 2d 768; 82 U.S.L.W. 3407; 571 U.S. 1120; 2014 WL 102996; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 320

Dydzak v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of Cal.

Opinion of the Court

Case below, 509 Fed.Appx. 653.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

Reference

Full Case Name
Daniel David DYDZAK v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.
Status
Published