Stoller v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau
Stoller v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau
136 S. Ct. 879; 193 L. Ed. 2d 703; 84 U.S.L.W. 3385; 2016 U.S. LEXIS 536
(Supreme Court Reporter)
Stoller v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau
Opinion of the Court
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.