Albert v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States
Albert v. Diversified Consultants, Inc., 138 S. Ct. 240 (2017)
199 L. Ed. 2d 7; 86 U.S.L.W. 3158; 2017 WL 3184398; 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4573

Albert v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

Reference

Full Case Name
Kallys ALBERT, Sr. v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC.
Status
Published