Cox v. United States
Cox v. United States
Opinion
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 585 U. S. ____ (2018) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 16–1017 _________________
LAITH G. COX, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES COURTNEY A. CRAIG, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES ANDREW K. LEWIS, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES IAN T. MILLER, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES JOSEPH D. MORCHINEK, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES KELVIN L. O’SHAUGHNESSY, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES [June 22, 2018]
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.