Supreme Court of the United States, 2020

Sharp v. Murphy

Sharp v. Murphy
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided July 9, 2020 · Per Curiam
591 U.S. 977 (United States Reports)
Sharp v. Murphy

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision. The 8 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 591 U. S. ____ (2020) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 17–1107 _________________

TOMMY SHARP, INTERIM WARDEN, PETITIONER v. PATRICK DWAYNE MURPHY ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT [July 9, 2020] PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is affirmed for the reasons stated in McGirt v. Oklahoma, ante, p. ___.

It is so ordered.

JUSTICE GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

JUSTICE THOMAS and JUSTICE ALITO dissent.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.