Sharp v. Murphy
Sharp v. Murphy
140 S. Ct. 2412; 207 L. Ed. 2d 1043
(Supreme Court Reporter)
Cases that cite this one
25 later published cases cite this decision.
- IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF K.D.B. (Okla. 2025)
- IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF K.D.B. (Okla. 2025)
- United States v. Little (10th Cir. 2024)
- Drinkert v. Payne (10th Cir. 2024)
- MCCAULEY v. STATE (Okla. Crim. App. 2024)
- United States v. Bailey (10th Cir. 2024)
- Pemberton v. Miller (United States District Court, Oklahoma Eastern 2024)
- Andrew v. White (10th Cir. 2023)
- Evitt v. Harpe (10th Cir. 2023)
- Parnell v. White (United States District Court, Oklahoma Northern 2023)
- Pacheco v. El Habti (10th Cir. 2022)
- Edmond v. Butler (10th Cir. 2022)
- Hyslop v. Bridges (United States District Court, Oklahoma Eastern 2022)
- Smallen v. Nunn (United States District Court, Oklahoma Eastern 2022)
- Hairrell v. Crow (United States District Court, Oklahoma Eastern 2022)
- Stiltner v. Nunn (United States District Court, Oklahoma Northern 2022)
- Montgomery v. Crow (United States District Court, Oklahoma Northern 2022)
- Greene v. Nunn (United States District Court, Oklahoma Northern 2022)
- Rowbotham v. Nunn (United States District Court, Oklahoma Northern 2022)
- Moland v. Crow (United States District Court, Oklahoma Northern 2022)
- Sampson v. Dowling (United States District Court, Oklahoma Northern 2021)
- Ross v. Pettigrew (United States District Court, Oklahoma Northern 2021)
- Ross v. Pettigrew (United States District Court, Oklahoma Northern 2021)
- Maples v. Whitten (United States District Court, Oklahoma Northern 2021)
- Pitts v. Crow (United States District Court, Oklahoma Western 2021)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is affirmed for the reasons stated in McGirt v. Oklahoma , --- U.S. ----,
It is so ordered.
Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Justice THOMAS and Justice ALITO dissent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.