Supreme Court of the United States, 2024

NVIDIA v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB

NVIDIA v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 11, 2024 · Per Curiam
604 U.S. 20 (United States Reports)
NVIDIA v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB

Opinion

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 604 U. S. Part 1 Pages 20–21

OFFICIAL REPORTS OF

THE SUPREME COURT December 11, 2024

Page Proof Pending Publication

REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions

NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, [email protected], of any typographical or other formal errors.

20 OCTOBER TERM, 2024 Syllabus

NVIDIA CORP. et al. v. E. OHMAN J:OR FONDER AB et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 23–970. Argued November 13, 2024—Decided December 11, 2024 Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 81 F. 4th 918.

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.

Neal Kumar Katyal argued the cause for petitioners.

With him on the briefs were Katherine B. Wellington, Wil- liam E. Havemann, Reedy C. Swanson, Sarah M. Lightdale, Patrick J. Hayden, John C. Dwyer, Patrick E. Gibbs, Sa- Page Proof Pending Publication mantha A. Kirby, and Kathleen R. Hartnett.

Deepak Gupta argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Jonathan E. Taylor, Gregory A. Beck, Eric F. Citron, Jennifer D. Bennett, Salvatore J. Graziano, and Andrew L. Zivitz.

Colleen E. Roh Sinzdak argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Prelogar, Deputy Solic- i tor General Stewart, Michael A. Conley, and Dani el Staroselsky.* *Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the Atlantic Legal Foundation by Lawrence S. Ebner; for the Digital Chamber by Frank Scaduto, Kevin B. Muhlendorf, and Krystal B. Swendsboe; for the Wash- ington Legal Foundation et al. by James N. Kramer and Daniel A. Ru- bens; and for Joseph A. Grundfest by Christopher G. Michel.

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the American Association for Justice by Robert S. Peck and Jeffrey R. White; for the Anti-Fraud Coalition by Tejinder Singh; for Certain Institutional Inves- tors by Paul Bland; for Quantitative Experts by John Paul Schnapper- Cite as: 604 U. S. 20 (2024) 21 Counsel

Page Proof Pending Publication

Casteras, Mark C. Rifkin, Benjamin Y. Kaufman, Matthew M. Guiney, Laura H. Posner, Carol V. Gilden, and Nicholas I. Porritt; and for Schol- ars of Civil Procedure by J. Carl Cecere, Jeremy A. Lieberman, and Emma Gilmore.

Briefs of amici curiae were filed for Former SEC Officials by Samuel H. Rudman, Daniel P. Chiplock, and Michael J. Miarmi; for Brian T.

Fitzpatrick by Javier Bleichmar and Joseph A. Fonti; and for Thomas Fuller Ogden, pro se.

Reporter’s Note The attached opinion has been revised to reflect the usual publication and citation style of the United States Reports. The revised pagination makes available the official United States Reports citation in advance of publication. The syllabus has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions Page Proof Pending Publication for the convenience of the reader and constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court. A list of counsel who argued or filed briefs in this case, and who were members of the bar of this Court at the time this case was argued, has been inserted following the syllabus. Other revisions may include adjustments to formatting, captions, citation form, and any errant punctuation. The following additional edits were made: None

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.