United States Tax Court, 1947

Earle Real Estate Co. v. Commissioner

Earle Real Estate Co. v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court · Decided June 20, 1947
6 T.C.M. 667; 1947 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 180
Earle Real Estate Co. v. Commissioner

Opinion

Earle Real Estate Co. v. Commissioner.
Earle Real Estate Co. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 8677.
United States Tax Court
1947 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 180; 6 T.C.M. (CCH) 667; T.C.M. (RIA) 47163;
June 20, 1947
*180 Lee C. Bradley, Jr., Esq., 2100 Comer Bldg., Birmingham 3, Ala., for the petitioner. John R. Stivers, Esq., for the respondent.

KERN

Opinion

KERN, Judge: Respondent's determination of deficiencies in petitioner's income tax for the year 1943 in the sum of $67,688.72, and in declared value excess profits tax of $33,315.89, are here at issue. The greater part of these deficiencies arises by reason of respondent's determination that:

"(a) Net income for the year 1943 is increased in the amount of $264,032.06, in order to reflect gain realized on distribution and/or disposition of property located at 1911-13 Second Avenue, North, Birmingham, Alabama. This gain is computed as follows:

Fair market value of property
at Dec. 31, 1943$375,000.00
Deduct:
Cost less depreciation and
amortization110,967.94
Gain realized$264,032.06"

A stipulation of facts was filed herein by the parties and we find the facts to be as stipulated.

The facts stipulated disclose that petitioner corporation in the taxable year made a distribution in kind to its stockholders of certain real estate owned by it. Its basis as to this property and the fair market value*181 thereof was as determined by respondent.

The primary issue presented is whether petitioner corporation realized taxable income by a distribution in kind to its stockholders of property which, at the time of distribution, had a fair market value in excess of the corporation's adjusted basis.

Respondent has not filed a brief herein and has indicated that he will file none.

On the authority of , we decide the issue first presented in favor of petitioner. See ; . Cf. .

It is therefore unnecessary to consider petitioner's alternative contentions.

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.