Keil v. Commissioner
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FAY,
Briefly stated, petitioners maintain that exacting payment of the amount in issue abridges their religious and moral freedom because the revenue would be used for military purposes. 1
This issue has been litigated many times recently. 2 While the facts may vary from case to case, we have carefully considered the law on this matter previously. *166 We do not question petitioners' sincerity. Nevertheless, religious or moral objections to policies of the Federal government do not absolve petitioners from any portion of their income tax liability, whether expressed in terms of the
*167 Accordingly, respondent's motion for judgment on the pleadings will be granted.
Footnotes
1. Apparently, petitioners arrived at the amount of their credit on the theory that 60 percent of Federal income taxes collected by the Government are being used to support the military. We note that a discrepancy of $.25 exists between the amount of the deficiency and the claimed credit.↩
2. See the following memorandum opinions of this Court for recent examples:
;Austin B. Wattles, T.C. Memo. 1976-217 ;Margaret G. Bowman, T.C. Memo. 1976-206 ;Wade Howard Wright, T.C. Memo. 1976-201 ;Henry Braun, T.C. Memo. 1976-185 ;Stephanie D. Judson, T.C. Memo. 1976-182 ;Melinda Tuhus, T.C. Memo. 1976-173 ;Peter Ronald Curia, T.C. Memo. 1976-74 .Charles E. Hecht, T.C. Memo. 1976-2↩
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.