ESTATE OF THALHEIMER v. COMMISSIONER
Opinion
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
GOFFE,
FINDINGS OF FACT
The fair market values of advances owed by Charles Street Development Corp. to ATAPCO on July 8, 1965 and December 8, 1965, did not exceed $450,000 on each of the said dates.
The underlying net asset values of the class A and class B common stock of ATAPCO as of July 8, 1965 and December 8, 1965, were $122,307,483 and $124,015,214, respectively, or $168.24 and $170.59 per share, respectively.
ULTIMATE FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The fair market value of Dr. Thalheimer's 15,367 shares of class A common stock of ATAPCO as of July 8, 1965, was $111 per share with a total fair market value of $1,705,737.
2. The fair market value of Dr. Thalheimer's 28,745 shares of class B common stock of ATAPCO as of July 8, 1965, was $106 per share with a total fair market value of $3,046.970.
3. The fair market value of Mrs. Blaustein's 9,700 shares of class*393 A common stock of ATAPCO as of December 8, 1965, was $112 per share with a total fair market value of $1,086,400.
4. The fair market value of Mrs. Blaustein's 29,100 shares of class B common stock of ATAPCO as of December 8, 1965, was $106 per share with a total fair market value of $3,084,600.
OPINION
ATAPCO and the other shareholders of Charles Street advanced funds to Charles Street proportionate to their stock ownership. On the valuation dates involved, July 8, 1965 and December 8, 1965, the net fair market value of the assets of Charles Street was $1,800,000. Charles Street owed advances to its shareholders in the amounts of $2,596,000 and $2,576,000 on July 8, 1965 and December 8, 1965, respectively. Because the liabilities of Charles Street exceeded its assets, the fair market value of ATAPCO's stock in Charles Street was zero and the fair market values of the advances from ATAPCO to Charles Street did not exceed $450,000 on both valuation dates. We do not agree with the characterization of the $450,000 which petitioners use in the memorandum accompanying their motion; i.e., capital investment. The $450,000 represents debt, not equity investment. There is no evidence*394 in the record that the advances from ATAPCO to Charles Street were anything other than debt.
Without deciding whether the cases cited by petitioners apply to our redetermination of value on January 11, 1977, in the redetermination herein we have rounded off the values to the nearest whole dollar amounts because petitioners and respondent both requested values in whole dollar amounts in their briefs. It is inappropriate, therefore, to value the shares with more precision than the parties requested.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.