Randolph v. Commissioner
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FAY,
Petitioners, John R. Randolph and Paula A. Randolph, resided in Las Vegas, Nev., when they filed their petition herein.
In his notice of deficiency, respondent determined petitioners omitted certain tip income of $1,032.76 from their 1972 gross income. In their petition, petitioners asserted money received from patrons of a gambling casino constitutes nontaxable gifts. Petitioners alleged in the alternative that respondent's determination of the amount of tips received by petitioners in 1972 was "arbitrary and excessive". At the call of the case, petitioner John R. Randolph entered his appearance, requested a trial by jury, *704 and stated that he would not present any evidence in his behalf.
It is well settled that "tokes" are not gifts but must be included in a taxpayer's gross income.
With respect to petitioner's request for a jury trial it is beyond question that there is no right to a jury trial in the Tax Court and the denial thereof does not violate the
Accordingly,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.