Radmacher v. Commissioner
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CLAPP,
This case was submitted fully stipulated pursuant to
The petitioners, Richard F. and Sally A. Radmacher, husband and wife, resided in Camden Point, Missouri, at the time their petition was filed. They timely filed a joint Federal income tax return for 1977 with the Internal Revenue Service Center at Kansas City, Missouri. Mr. Radmacher will sometimes be referred to as the petitioner.
Petitioner is a veteran of the U.S. Air Force. During 1977, petitioner was employed as an airline pilot with Braniff Airways, Inc. In that year, he attended a flight training course offered by Martin Aviation, Inc. in Santa Ana, California.
The tuition and fee expenses for this course were in the amount of $9,300.76. Pursuant to
On their 1977 Federal income tax return petitioners excluded the VA payment from income pursuant to
In his notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed the flight training deduction in full. He has since conceded that petitioners' flight training expenses are allowable except for that portion of the tuition and fee expenses in the amount of $7,853.18 paid by the educational assistance allowance from the VA.
Thus, the sole issue for our determination is whether flight training expenses may be deducted when they are reimbursed by nontaxable benefits from the VA. This issue was thoroughly considered in
As we find this case indistinguishable from
Because of concessions,
Footnotes
1. All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended and in effect during the taxable year at issue.↩
2. See also
;Zamora v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1983-660 . But seeWebster v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1983-682 . As stated inBaker v. United States, F. Supp. (N.D. Ga. 1983)Webster v. Commissioner, supra ,↩ we respectfully decline to follow the District Court's holding.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.