McConnell v. Commissioner
Opinion
*665
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NIMS,
Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and attached exhibit are incorporated herein by this reference.
Petitioners resided in Phoenix, Arizona, at the time the petition in this case was filed. Petitioners filed a joint Federal income tax return for the taxable year 1983. Respondent disallowed $ 887 of the charitable deduction claimed on petitioners' return.
Petitioners bear the burden of proving that the deficiency determined in respondent's notice of deficiency is incorrect. Rule 142(a); 1.*666 In this case petitioners presented no proof other than petitioner Kenneth McConnell's uncorroborated testimony that petitioners made charitable contributions in the amount of $ 875 in excess of the amounts allowed by respondent.
We find McConnell's testimony self-serving and lacking credibility. It is well established that we need not accept a party's self-serving testimony without substantiating documentation to meet that party's burden of proof. , affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court. Accordingly, the deduction is disallowed.
To reflect the foregoing,
Footnotes
1. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. ↩
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.