Redd v. Commissioner
Opinion
*555 An order will be issued granting respondent's motion for partial summary judgment.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PARR,
Petitioner is the same person who was the defendant in the criminal case of
*556 On June 24, 1986, petitioner was found guilty on two counts of violating defendant did willfully and knowingly attempt to evade and defeat a large part of the income taxes due and owing by her and her husband to the United States of America for the calendar years 1979 and 1980, by preparing and causing to be prepared, by signing and causing to be signed, and by mailing and causing to be mailed, false and fraudulent income tax returns on behalf of herself and her husband, which were filed with the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of
On May 5, 1987, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision in an unpublished opinion.
Summary judgment is intended to expedite litigation and avoid unnecessary and expensive trials of phantom factual issues.
One of the issues in the instant case is whether petitioner is liable for the addition to tax for fraud under section 6653(b) for the taxable years 1979 and 1980. Respondent contends that both the imposition of the civil fraud addition and the judgment of conviction of petitioner for violating
The elements of criminal tax evasion and of civil tax fraud are similar.
Numerous Federal courts have held that a conviction for Federal income tax evasion, either upon a plea of guilty, or upon a jury verdict of guilt, conclusively establishes fraud in a subsequent civil tax fraud proceeding through application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel.
In her objection, petitioner argues that she pled innocent in her previous trial, that she is currently suing the attorney who represented her because of "legal irregularities", that the Government's case was based on perjury and tainted testimony, and that the evidence did not support the conviction.
Petitioner raised or could have raised these arguments in the District Court or in her appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The latter court considered and affirmed her conviction. We therefore hold that petitioner is estopped from denying that underpayments of her income taxes for the taxable years 1979 and 1980 are due to fraud for purposes of section 6653(b).
Footnotes
1. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise indicated.↩
2. Although petitioner's first name is spelled "Francis" in the indictment, and in the style of the case in the U.S. District Court and the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, petitioner does not dispute that she is the same person.↩
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.