ROGER G. v. COMMISSIONER
Opinion
*133 PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
GOLDBERG, SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of
Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners' 1997 Federal income tax in the amount of $ 2,487. After concessions, 1 the sole issue for decision is whether petitioners are entitled to an overpayment of their 1997 tax liability.
*134 Some of the facts were stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and exhibits submitted at trial are incorporated herein. Petitioners resided in Des Moines, Washington, at the time their petition was filed. References to petitioner in the singular are to Roger G. Maki.
Petitioner received Form SSA-1099 reporting $ 7,485.60 in Social Security benefits in 1997. Petitioners reported $ 6,362, or 85 percent of the Social Security benefits, on their 1997 Federal income tax return. Petitioners timely filed their Federal income tax return for 1997.
In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that petitioners failed to report $ 6,362 taxable Social Security benefits, $ 2,494 capital gain dividends, and $ 366 taxable dividends. At trial, respondent accepted petitioners' 1997 Federal income tax return as filed. 2 Nevertheless, petitioners now contend that the Social Security disability income is non-taxable because "the bill has never passed that says that Social Security" is taxable. On that basis, petitioners believe they are entitled to a refund for the overpayment of tax. Respondent contends that the law is clear and petitioners' Social Security income was correctly*135 reported on their 1997 income tax return as taxable income under
Under the provisions of
Petitioners reported the following income on their 1997 Federal income tax return:
Wages $ 64,347
Taxable interest 2,765
Dividends 584
Capital gain 256
Total pensions and annuities 3 6,362
*137 Rental real estate, etc. 58
_______
Total $ 74,372
=======
For 1997, petitioners' modified adjusted gross income was $ 68,010. 4 Because petitioners' modified adjusted gross income is more than the adjusted base amount of
We note that petitioners have previously litigated this issue with respect to their 1991 taxable year, and we decided the issue for respondent. See
Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division.
Decision will be entered under Rule 155.
Footnotes
1. Petitioners concede unreported capital gain of $ 1,378.↩
2. Upon further review, respondent determined that all items on the notice of deficiency, with the exception of $ 1,378 of unreported capital gains, were reported on petitioners' return, although on the wrong lines of the return.↩
3. Petitioners mistakenly reported Social Security benefits on line 16b rather than line 20a.↩
4. $ 74,372 (adjusted gross income) less $ 6,362 (Social Security benefits) = $ 68,010.↩
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.