Ozaki v. Comm'r
Opinion
*214 Petitioner was liable for additions to tax for years at issue.
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
CHIECHI, Judge: Respondent determined the following deficiencies in, and additions to, petitioner's Federal income tax (tax):
Additions to Tax
Year Deficiency
1994 $ 9,397 $ 1,135.00 --- $ 276.79
1995 12,201 1,484.08 --- 361.11
1996 12,247 1,406.70 $ 1,563.00 349.34
1997 14,220 1,593.45 1,628.86 395.91
1998 15,372 1,722.60 1,301.52 386.40
1999 21,621 1,235.03 603.79 205.78
2000 20,063 1,471.95 327.10 270.37
The issues remaining for decision are: 2
(1) Is petitioner*215 liable for the addition to tax under
(2) Is petitioner liable for the addition to tax under
FINDINGS OF FACT
Most of the facts have been deemed established pursuant to the Court's Order under
At the time petitioner filed the petition in this case, he resided in Chicago, Illinois.
Throughout the years at issue until the time of the trial in this case, petitioner, *216 who received a master's degree in music from Northwestern University, has worked as a sales manager and as a singer/composer.
During World War II, when petitioner's mother was 13 years old, and when petitioner's father was 17 years old, the U.S. Government confined each of them and their respective families in certain Government facilities because of their Japanese ancestry. Petitioner's parents made petitioner aware of their respective experiences in those facilities.
The last tax return (return) filed by petitioner was for his taxable year 1991. Petitioner did not file a return for any of the taxable years at issue, although he received timely one or more Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, and one or more Forms 1099-NEC, Non-Employee Compensation, for each of those years.
No physician or psychologist has made a determination that petitioner suffered from a mental illness or condition that prevented him from complying with the tax laws for the years at issue.
Respondent sent to petitioner a notice of deficiency (notice) for petitioner's taxable years 1994 and 1995, a separate notice for petitioner's taxable years 1996, 1997, and 1998, and a separate notice for petitioner's taxable*217 years 1999 and 2000. In those notices, respondent determined that for the years indicated petitioner received the following amounts of taxable income from the following sources:
Tax Year 1994
Source Amount
Bands and Bows $ 1,500
Orchestral Assoc. 5,425
United Bindery 39,940
Walt Disney 401
Pictures
1st Commercial 83
Total Income $ 47,349
Tax Year 1995
Source Amount
Bands and Bows $ 800
Orchestral Assoc. 9,981
Fleur De Lys 775
United Bindery 45,700
*218 1st Commercial 20
Total Income $ 57,276
Tax Year 1996
Source Amount
Bands and Bows $ 1,600
Orchestral Assoc. 7,528
United Bindery 48,725
1st Commercial 15
Total Income $ 57,868
Tax Year 1997
Source Amount
Bands and Bows $ 1,440
Orchestral Assoc. 10,729
United Bindery 51,620
1st Commercial 17
Oak Park Temple 1,080
Total Income $ 64,886
*219 Tax Year 1998
Source Amount
Orchestral Assoc. $ 4,739
United Bindery 56,061
1st Commercial 22
Oak Park Temple 1,578
St. Ferdinand's 5,242
Total Income $ 67,642
Tax Year 1999
Source Amount
Chicago Sinai $ 300
Congregation
St. Ferdinand's 1,735
United Bindery 78,469
Orchestral Assoc. 7,369
Oak Park Temple 1,480
1st Commercial 28
Total Income $ 89,381
*220 Tax Year 2000
Source Amount
Chicago Sinai $ 75
Congregation
United Bindery 75,175
Orchestral Assoc. 7,651
Oak Park Temple 1,630
1st Commercial 41
Halevi Choral 690
Chicago Sinai 150
Congregation
Half Note Music 29
Total Income 3 $ 85,441
OPINION
Petitioner has the burden of proving that respondent's determinations under
*221 Petitioner claims that his failure to file a return for any of the years at issue and to pay estimated tax for each such year is attributable to his "mental illness caused by failure of U.S. Government to acknowledge that violation of constitutional and civil rights of Japanese Americans during World War 2 has debilitating and demoralizing effects on the child (Edward Kazuo Ozaki) of U.S. concentration camp survivors."
With respect to the determinations at issue under
Except for his self-serving testimony, on which we are unwilling to rely, petitioner has introduced no evidence establishing*222 that he had a mental illness or mental incapacity which prevented him from filing a return for each of the years at issue. In fact, the record establishes that, throughout the years at issue until the time of the trial in this case, petitioner has worked as a sales manager and as a singer/composer and has almost doubled his income throughout that period. On the record before us, we find that petitioner has failed to carry his burden of proving that he suffered from a mental illness or mental incapacity which prevented him from filing a return for each of the years at issue. On that record, we further find that petitioner has failed to prove that he is not liable for the addition to tax under
With respect to the determinations at issue under
To reflect the foregoing, respondent's concession, and the issues deemed abandoned*223 by petitioner,
Decision will be entered under
Footnotes
1. All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
2. The only determinations in the notices of deficiency for the years at issue that petitioner disputes relate to the additions to tax under
secs. 6651(a)(1) and(2) and6654(a) . Respondent concedes the determinations undersec. 6651(a)(2) . We conclude that petitioner has abandoned contesting any remaining determinations in the notices of deficiency for the years at issue other than the determinations undersecs. 6651(a)(1) and6654(a)↩ .3. There was a mathematical error in computing the total income of petitioner for the tax year 2000 that appeared in the facts deemed established under
Rule 91(f)↩ . The correct total income of petitioner for that year, i.e., $ 85,441, as determined in the pertinent notice, is used here.4. The record does not disclose when respondent commenced an examination of each of the years at issue. We proceed on the assumption that respondent's examination of each of those years commenced after July 22, 1998, and that
sec. 7491(c) is applicable in the instant case.The record establishes that petitioner did not file a tax return or pay estimated tax for any of the years at issue. We conclude that respondent has satisfied respondent's burden of production under
sec. 7491(c)↩ .
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.