GIBBONS v. COMMISSIONER
Opinion
*7 PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
COUVILLION, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 in effect at the time the petition was filed. 1 The decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be cited as authority.
Respondent determined a deficiency of $ 3,044 in petitioner's 2002 Federal income tax. The sole issue for decision is whether petitioner is liable for the 10-percent additional tax under
Some of the facts were stipulated. Those facts and the accompanying exhibits are so found and are incorporated herein by reference. Petitioner's legal residence*8 at the time the petition was filed was Casco Township, Michigan.
Petitioner was employed as a schoolteacher by the Fraser Public School System (the school system). The school system maintained a pension plan for its employees (including petitioner), which qualified, as stipulated by the parties, as a
During the year 2002, petitioner, as an employee and a participant in the pension plan, withdrew $ 67,552.64 from the plan, the proceeds of which were to fund her daughter's higher education expenses.
On her Federal income tax return for 2002, petitioner reported the entire amount of the pension plan withdrawal as income; however, petitioner failed to report a liability for the 10-percent
At trial, respondent's position was that no portion of the $ 67,552.64 early distribution qualified for higher education expenses for the reason that the pension plan of the school system was not in the category of qualified plans as to which the provisions of
*10
Congress intended the exception of Penalty free IRA withdrawals for education expenses -- The bill provides that individuals may make penalty-free withdrawals from their IRAs to pay for the undergraduate and graduate higher education expenses of themselves, their spouses, their children and grandchildren or the children or grandchildren of their spouses. [Emphasis added.]
H. Rept. 105-148, at 288-289 (1997), 1997-4 C.B. (Vol. 1) 319, 610- 611. The report of the Committee on the Budget specifically provides that only withdrawals from IRAs that are used for higher education expenses will qualify as withdrawals excepted from the 10-percent additional tax. Id. No other types of qualified plans are provided this exemption from the
As noted earlier, the parties stipulated that the school system plan in which petitioner participated was a
In
Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division.
Decision will be entered for respondent.
Footnotes
1. Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue.↩
2. Even though respondent's position at trial was that no portion of the $ 67,552.64 early withdrawal was subject to exclusion from the
sec. 72(t) additional tax, counsel for respondent stated that respondent would not move to increase the deficiency to apply thesec. 72(t)↩ additional tax to the $ 37,112.64, which was allowed as a higher education expense prior to issuance of the notice of deficiency.3. Because the Court holds that the withdrawal by petitioner, as a matter of law, was not subject to the exemption from the
sec. 72(t)↩ additional tax, the Court need not decide whether the evidence presented at trial established that the funds withdrawn from the pension plan were in fact used for higher educational expenses.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.