Sheikh v. Comm'r
Opinion
*65 PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
FOLEY, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to
BACKGROUND
In 2003, petitioner, who was less than 59-1/2 years of age, received a $ 9,776 distribution from a qualified retirement plan. Petitioner reported the distribution on his 2003 Federal income tax*66 return. On January 23, 2006, respondent sent petitioner a notice of deficiency relating to 2003. In the notice, respondent determined that petitioner was liable for the section 72(t) 10percent additional tax because petitioner received an early distribution from a qualified retirement plan. On April 18, 2006, petitioner, while residing in Joliet, Illinois, filed his petition with the Court and contested the 10-percent additional tax.
DISCUSSION
Section 72(t)(1) imposes a 10-percent additional tax on an early distribution from a qualified retirement plan. Petitioner contends that he is not liable for the additional tax because of financial hardship. Section 72(t)(2) lists several exceptions to the additional tax, but there is no exception relating to financial hardship.
Contentions we have not addressed are irrelevant, moot, or meritless. To reflect the foregoing,
Decision will be entered for respondent.
Footnotes
1. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue.↩
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.