Grabowski v. Comm'r
Opinion
*77 PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
FOLEY, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to
BACKGROUND
During 1998, petitioner and his brother, Patrick Grabowski, operated several businesses including a property management company, a trailer park, and two motels (collectively, the businesses). Petitioner*78 was responsible for the onsite management of the businesses while Patrick paid the expenses and maintained the books and records.
Petitioner, on his 1998 Federal income tax return, reported losses relating to the businesses. On April 25, 2005, respondent issued petitioner a notice of deficiency relating to 1998. Respondent determined that petitioner did not substantiate the losses relating to the businesses and was liable for the
On July 25, 2005, petitioner, while residing in Lake Ozark, Missouri, filed his petition with the Court.
DISCUSSION
Petitioner contends that the losses relating to the motels and trailer park are deductible pursuant to
*79
Respondent established that petitioner erroneously reported income resulting in a $ 25,643 understatement of tax relating to 1998.
Petitioner contends that he was unable to*80 substantiate the losses because Patrick refused to provide the businesses' records. On August 16, 2002, the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, issued an order requiring Patrick to provide petitioner with the business records. Patrick did not comply with the California Court's order. On February 26, 2007, Patrick evaded service of a subpoena for the 1998 records and did not provide petitioner with access to such records. Petitioner has earnestly and diligently attempted to obtain the requisite documentation. Thus, he has demonstrated reasonable cause for his failure to substantiate the losses and has acted in good faith. Accordingly, petitioner is not liable for the
Contentions we have not addressed are irrelevant, moot, or meritless.
To reflect the foregoing,
Decision will be entered for respondent as to the deficiency; decision will be entered for petitioner as to the accuracy-related penalty.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.