United States Tax Court, 2008

Oak Leaf Trading, LLC v. Comm'r

Oak Leaf Trading, LLC v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court · Decided July 29, 2008 · \Maurice B. Foley\""
2008 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 41 (United States Reports)
Oak Leaf Trading, LLC v. Comm'r

Opinion

OAK LEAF TRADING, LLC, STEVEN SCHLAM 1999 REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST, A PARTNER OTHER THAN THE TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Oak Leaf Trading, LLC v. Comm'r
Docket No. 1896-06
United States Tax Court
2008 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 41;
July 29, 2008, Decided
*41 For Petitioner: Steven Aaron Horowitz, Bar No: HS0340, Horowitz & Rubenstein LLC, Roslyn Heights, NY.
Maurice B. Foley, Judge.

Maurice B. Foley
DECISION

Pursuant to Tax Court Rule 248(b), it is

ORDERED AND DECIDED: That the following statement shows the adjustments to the partnership items of Oak Leaf Trading, LLC, for the taxable years 1999 and 2000:

Taxable year 1999
Partnership ItemAs ReportedAs Determined
Ordinary Income,
 Other Income$15,381$- 0 -
Deductions,
 Other Deductions$4,748$- 0 -
Capital Contributions$331,498$- 0 -
Taxable year 2000
Partnership ItemAs ReportedAs Determined
Ordinary Income,
 Other Income<$192,298>$- 0 -
Deductions,
 Other Deductions$13,719$- 0 -
Distribution of Property$99,992$- 0 -

It is determined that Steven Schlam is treated as having a tax basis in the property distributed to him from Oak Leaf Trading, LLC, in the amount of $94,992.00 ($64,595.00 with respect to 2,063 shares of AT&T stock in lieu of $13,668,058.00 as reflected on Steven and Elisheva Schlam's 2000 federal income tax return, and $30,397.00 with respect to 33,888 Euros in lieu of $6,432,138.00 as reflected on Steven and Elisheva Schlam's 2000 federal income tax return), consistent with the treatment of Steven Schlam having directly*42 purchased said property.

It is determined that the 40 percent gross valuation misstatement penalty under I.R.C. section 6662(a), (b)(3), (e) and (h) applies to any underpayment of tax attributable to any gross valuation misstatement resulting from adjustments of the above partnership items for the taxable years 1999 and 2000.

It is determined that the 20 percent penalty applies to any additional underpayment of tax not attributable to any gross valuation misstatement, which is attributable to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations under I.R.C. section 6662(a), (b)(1) and (c) or a substantial understatement of income tax under I.R.C. section 6662(a), (b)(2) and (d) for the taxable years 1999 and 2000.

/s/ Maurice B. Foley

Judge

Entered: JUL 29 2008

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.