Delaware Valley Apartment House Owners Ass'n v. United States
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Empire Gas Corp. (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1976)
- Independent Gasoline Marketers Council v. Department of Energy (District Court, District of Columbia 1981)
- Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corporation, Federal Energy Administration, Intervenor-Appellee (5th Cir. 1978)
- Petrolane Inc. v. United States (United States District Court for the Central District of California 1978)
- Allied Paper Inc. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. (Emergency Court of Appeals 1977)
- Birkenfeld v. City of Berkeley (Cal. 1976)
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Energy Administration (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1976)
- Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp. (United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama 1976)
- Wentz Heating & Air Conditioning Co. v. Federal Energy Administration (United States District Court, Nebraska 1976)
- United States v. Empire Gas Corp (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals 1976)
- Exxon Corp. v. Federal Energy Administration (District Court, District of Columbia 1975)
- Exxon Corp. v. Federal Energy Administration (District Court, D. New Jersey 1975)
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Federal Energy Administration (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 1975)
- Delaware River Port Authority v. Tiemann (District Court, D. New Jersey 1975)
- Carpenters 46 County Conference Board v. Construction Industry Stabilization Committee (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1975)
- Cities Service Co. v. Federal Energy Administration (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals 1975)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This suit by. Delaware Valley Apartment House Owners Association seeks to restrain the government from enforcing Price Commission Regulation 301.208, 6 C.F.R. § 301.208, which undertakes to control the imposition of certain rent increases in excess of 8 per cent. It is complained that the regulation exceeds the authority delegated by Congress and that it invidiously discriminates against certain landlords and deprives them of their “inherent right of contract.”
After the facts had been stipulated, the district court entered judgment for the defendant. This appeal followed.
In an elaborate opinion the district court considered and rejected each of the appellant’s legal arguments. Delaware Valley Apt. House Owners Assn. v. United States, E.D.Pa., decided Oct. 12, 1972, 350 F.Supp. 1144. We find no essential error in the district court’s disposition of any of the appellants’ contentions.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.