Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. v. Zarb
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision. The 18 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Shell Oil Co. v. Federal Energy Administration (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 1977)
- Shell Oil Co. v. Federal Energy Administration (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals 1975)
- State Of Ohio Department Of Human Services v. United States Department Of Health & Human Services (6th Cir. 1988)
- United States v. Rainbow Family (District Court, E.D. Texas 1988)
- Ohio Department of Human Services v. United States Department of Health & Human Services, Health Care Financing Administration (6th Cir. 1988)
- Williams v. Pierce (2d Cir. 1983)
- Williams v. Pierce (2d Cir. 1983)
- National Federation of Federal Employees v. Devine (D.C. Cir. 1982)
- Tosco Corp. v. Department of Energy (District Court, D. Nevada 1982)
- Shimek v. Department of Energy (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals 1981)
- Ca 79-2913 United States Steel Corporation, and Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (7th Cir. 1979)
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Energy Administration (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1979)
- Standard Oil Co. v. Federal Energy Administration (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1978)
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Department of Energy (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 1978)
- Standard Oil Co. v. Department of Energy (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals 1978)
- Shell Oil Co. v. Federal Energy Administration (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals 1978)
- Postal Colony Co., Inc. v. Askew (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Energy Administration (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1976)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The complaint in this case challenged a Federal Energy Administration interim price regulation for unleaded gasoline that was in effect only from June 1, 1974 to July 9, 1974. The district court rendered a declaratory judgment that the challenged regulation was invalid because it was imposed without such advance public notice and opportunity to comment as the Administrative Procedure Act requires. However, the court also denied the plaintiff’s prayer for relief by way of restitution. Both parties have appealed, the plaintiff from the denial of restitution, and the Federal Energy Administrator from the declaratory invalidation of the challenged order.
After examination of the briefs and the record, this court has concluded that there is no reversible error in either of the challenged provisions of the district court’s judgment.
The judgment is affirmed in its entirety-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.