U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1980

United States v. London

United States v. London
U S Air Force Court of Military Review · Decided October 31, 1980
10 M.J. 569; 1980 CMR LEXIS 488
United States v. London

Opinion of the Court

DECISION UPON RECONSIDERATION

PER CURIAM:

In our original decision, United States v. London, 9 M.J. 905 (A.F.C.M.R. 1980), we reassessed the sentence because of matters considered improperly by the convening authority in his review of the case. By motion, timely filed, the accused has requested that we reconsider the sentence we approved after reassessment. Noting that the motion is unopposed by appellate Government counsel, we grant the motion.

On the basis of the record as a whole, including the new matters submitted by appellate defense counsel in support of their motion,* we modify our previous decision by approving only so much of the sentence as provides for a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for twelve months, forfeiture of $200.00 per month for nine months and reduction to airman.

The findings of guilty and the sentence, as further modified, are

AFFIRMED.

We note that the accused has been restored to duty.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.