United States v. Perry
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Williams (United States Court of Military Appeals 1994)
- United States v. Joseph (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1993)
- United States v. Frye (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1992)
- United States v. Randle (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1992)
- United States v. Simmons (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1991)
- United States v. Guerrero (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1988)
- United States v. Mullens (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1987)
- United States v. Mullens (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellant alleges and government agrees that the military judge erred in adjudging a sentence to forfeitures in excess of the statutory limits for a special court-martial. Appellant further alleges that the convening authority’s action which approves a forfeiture of $625.00 pay per month for 75 days is contrary to Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, Rule for Courts-Martial 1003(b)(2) which requires that a sentence to forfeitures shall state the exact amount in whole dollars to be forfeited each month, and the number of months the forfeitures will last. We agree and will reassess the sentence.
The findings of guilty are affirmed. Reassessing the sentence based upon the error noted and the entire record, only so much of the sentence is affirmed as provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 75 days, forfeiture of $426.00 pay per month for two months and reduction to Private E-l.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.