United States Court of Federal Claims, 2013

Amy Mahoney, Parent of A.M., a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services 0

Amy Mahoney, Parent of A.M., a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services 0
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided November 1, 2013 · Special Master Vowell
Amy Mahoney, Parent of A.M., a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services 0

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No.05-0289V Filed: November 1, 2013 Not to be Published **************************** AMY MAHONEY, parent of * A.M., a minor, * * Autism; Attorneys’ Fees and Costs Petitioner, * * v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES * * Respondent. * * **************************** DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1 On November 1, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Concerning Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. After informal discussions, the parties have agreed on $9,750.55 in attorneys’ fees and costs and $150.00 in petitioner’s costs for a total of $9,900.55. In lieu of filing a Vaccine General Order #9 statement, petitioner’s counsel represents that petitioner had $150.00 in costs that petitioner personally incurred that are compensable under § 15 (e)(1).

The request for attorneys’ fees and costs is granted. Petitioner is awarded reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to §§ 15(b) and (e)(1), as I find that the petition was brought in good faith and upon a reasonable basis, and the amounts requested are reasonable and appropriate.

Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will redact such material from public access.

Accordingly, I hereby award the total amount of $9,900.55 as follows:  a lump sum of $9,750.55, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C.; and  a lump sum of $150.00, in the form of a check payable solely to petitioner.

In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review filed pursuant to Appendix B of the Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the Clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.2 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Chief Special Master

Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review. See Vaccine Rule 11(a).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.