United States Court of Federal Claims, 2014

Ahern v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided July 11, 2014 · Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-676V (Filed: June 6, 2014; Re-Issued: June 20, 2014)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * TERRI AHERN, *

* Stipulation; Influenza Vaccine; Petitioner, * Shoulder Injury; Attorneys’

* Fees and Costs

v. *

* SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Paul Brazil, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner Althea Walker Davis, Washington, DC, for Respondent

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On June 5, 2014, Respondent filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Terri Ahern on September 12, 2013. In her petition, Petitioner alleged that the influenza vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), and which she received on September 21, 2010, caused her to develop a shoulder injury. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition. Stipulation at ¶¶ 2, 4, 5.

Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused Petitioner to suffer a shoulder injury. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include: a. A lump sum payment of $20,000.00 in the form of a check payable to

Petitioner, Terri Ahern. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a); and

b. A lump sum of $15,000.00, in the form of a check payable jointly to

Petitioner and Petitioner’s attorney, Paul Brazil, for attorneys’ fees and costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e), and in compliance with General Order #9, no out-of-pocket expenses were incurred by Petitioner in proceeding on the petition.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 13-676V according to this decision and the attached stipulation. 2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Camille Collett, at (202) 357- 6361.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman Special Master

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this order on the United States Court of Federal Claims website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, “the entire” order will be available to the public. Id. 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.