Ahlum v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 12-763V
Filed: July 31, 2014
Not for Publication
*************************************
DOUG AHLUM and KARI AHLUM, *
Parents and Next of Kin to T.A., * *
Petitioners, * Interim attorneys’ fees and costs decision * based on stipulation of fact v. * *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * *
Respondent. * * *************************************
Andrew D. Downing, Phoenix, AZ, for petitioners.
Debra Filteau Begley, Washington, DC, for respondent.
MILLMAN, Special Master
DECISION AWARDING INTERIM ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1
On July 31, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an appropriate amount for interim attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioners assert that they have not incurred any costs in pursuit of their petition to date.
Petitioners submitted their request for interim attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain items in petitioners’ application. Based on these objections, petitioners amend their application for interim attorneys’ fees and costs to $60,000.00. Respondent does not object to this amount and elects not to raise her statutory objection to this particular request for interim attorneys’ fees and costs. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards: a. $33,000.00, representing reimbursement for interim attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioners, petitioners’ attorney Andrew D. Downing, and Rhodes, Hieronymus, Jones, Tucker & Gable in the amount of $33,000.00; and b. $27,000.00, representing reimbursement for interim attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioners, petitioners’ attorney Andrew D. Downing, and Hennelly & Steadman P.L.C. in the amount of $27,000.00.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 31, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman Laura D. Millman Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.