United States Court of Federal Claims, 2014

Lee v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided December 17, 2014 · Nora Beth Dorsey

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: November 26, 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED GLYNIS LEE, * No. 13-348V

Petitioner, *

* Special Master Dorsey v. *

* Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Reasonable Amount Requested to which AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Respondent Does not Object.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * Sean Franks Greenwood, Gauthier Houghtaling and Williams, Houston, TX, for petitioner. Ann Donohue Martin, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS DECISION1

On May 22, 2013, Glynis Lee (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that she suffered optic neuritis as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination that she received on February 1, 2012. See Petition at 1. On October 14, 2014, a decision was entered based on the parties’ stipulation awarding compensation to petitioner.

On November 26, 2014, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Concerning Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. According to the stipulation, the parties stipulate to a total award to petitioner of attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $5,842.19. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner’s counsel states that petitioner did not personally incur costs in pursuit of her claim.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300 aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of the parties’ stipulation, the undersigned GRANTS the request for approval and payment of attorneys’ fees and costs.

Accordingly, an award should be made as follows: in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and to petitioner’s attorney, Sean Franks Greenwood, of Gauthier Houghtaling and Williams, in the amount of $5,842.19. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this decision on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the entire decision will be available to the public. Id. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.