Jesrani v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 13-724V
Filed: December 23, 2014 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED DEEPAK JESRANI, * * Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman Petitioner, * * Decision on Attorneys’ Fees and v. * Costs; Reasonable Amount * Requested to Which Respondent SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Does Not Object.
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * *
Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Lisa A. Roquemore, Law Office of Lisa A. Roquemore, Irvine, CA, for Petitioner.
Lindsay Corliss, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
DECISION 1
On September 24, 2013, Deepak Jesrani (“Petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that he suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to him on September 29, 2010. On September 25, 2014, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to Petitioner.
On December 22, 2014, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Concerning Final Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. The parties have agreed to an award of $45,000.00 for attorneys’ fees and costs. In accordance with General Order Number 9, Petitioner’s counsel represents that Petitioner has incurred $400.00 in personal litigation costs in pursuit of his claim.
The undersigned finds that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby awards the amount of $45,000.00, in the form of a check made payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Lisa Roquemore, of the Law Office of Lisa A. Roquemore. The undersigned also awards the amount of $400.00, in the form of a check made payable solely to Petitioner.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 3
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.