United States Court of Federal Claims, 2015

Monteith v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided March 6, 2015 · Nora Beth Dorsey

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Filed: February 12, 2015 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED JOHN MONTEITH, * * No. 14-030V Petitioner, * * Special Master Dorsey v. * * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Reasonable Amount Requested to which AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Respondent Does not Object. *

Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Andrew Donald Downing, Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, for petitioner.

Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS DECISION1

On January 13, 2014, John Monteith (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006).

Petitioner alleged that he suffered from transverse myelitis as a result of an influenza vaccine that he received on January 14, 2011. See Petition at 1. On January 22, 2015, the undersigned entered a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based upon the stipulation of the parties.

On February 11, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs.

According to the stipulation, the parties stipulate to a total award to petitioner of attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $29,324.25. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner’s counsel states that petitioner did not personally incur any costs in pursuit of his claim.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300 aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request and the lack of any objection by respondent, the undersigned GRANTS the request for approval and payment of attorneys’ fees and costs.

Accordingly, an award should be made as follows:3 (1) in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and to petitioner’s attorney, Andrew Donald Downing and Hennelly & Steadman, PLC, in the amount of $17,819.90, and (2) in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Andrew D. Downing and Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC, in the amount of $11,504.35.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.4

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this decision on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the entire decision will be available to the public. Id. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. 3 Because petitioner’s counsel changed law firms while this case was pending, the parties requested that the undersigned and the court’s judgment award attorneys’ fees and costs set forth in the decision, to reflect work performed by Mr. Downing while at the two law firms. This request is granted the decision is drafted accordingly. 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.