Larocco v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-755V Filed: March 30, 2015
*************************** UNPUBLISHED MATTHEW LAROCCO, *
* Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman Petitioner, *
v. * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; Reasonable Amount
* Requested to which Respondent Does Not SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Object.
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*************************** Isaiah R. Kalinowski, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Michael P. Milmoe, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION1
On September 27, 2013, Matthew LaRocco (“Petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that he suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) and that this injury had been caused by an influenza (“flu”) vaccination received on October 19, 2011. Petition (“Pet”) at 1-2. The parties have reached a tentative agreement in the case, and a stipulation regarding entitlement will be filed by no later than June 1, 2015.
On March 30, 2015, Petitioner filed a Stipulation of Facts Concerning Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. Pursuant to their Stipulation, the parties have agreed to an award of $23,297.48 in attorneys’ fees and costs. In accordance with General Order Number 9, Petitioner represents that he did not personally incur any expenses in pursuit of this claim.
The undersigned finds that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and appropriate. The undersigned construes this as an application for final attorneys’ fees and costs. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby awards the amount of $23,297.48, in the form of a check made payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Isaiah Kalinowski, Esq.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.