Stout v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-026V
Filed: April 15, 2015
Unpublished
**************************** ELAINE STOUT, *
* Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
* Influenza (“flu”) vaccine; Shoulder Injury v. * Related to Vaccine Administration
* (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit * (“SPU”)
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
* Respondent. *
**************************** Michael McLaren, Black McLaren Jones Ryland & Griffee, Memphis, TN, for petitioner. Gordon Shemin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1
Vowell, Chief Special Master:
On January 9, 2015, Elaine Stout filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq, 2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. The petition alleges that as a result of an Influenza (“flu”) vaccination on January 10, 2013, petitioner suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.
On April 15, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report [“Respondent’s Report”], in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Report at 3. Specifically, respondent “concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a SIRVA and that it was caused in fact by the flu vaccine she received on January 10, 2013.” Id. Respondent stated that “based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the [Vaccine] Act.” Id. at 4.
In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that petitioner is entitled to compensation. s/Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Chief Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.