United States Court of Federal Claims, 2015

Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United States

Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided May 11, 2015 · Mary Ellen Coster Williams
121 Fed. Cl. 134; 2015 U.S. Claims LEXIS 558; 2015 WL 2228061
Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United States

Opinion

Amendment of Opinion

ORDER AMENDING APRIL 30, 2015 OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAMS, Judge,

On May 4, 2015, the Court received an ex parte email communication from the Special Assistant to a Commissioner at the Postal Regulatory Commission requesting a eorrec *135 tion of the Court’s April 30, 2015 decision. On May 5, 2015, the Court issued a Notice informing the parties of this communication and requesting that the parties file their positions regarding the resolution of this request. Neither Plaintiff nor Defendant took a position on whether the requested correction should be made.

The Court amends the following sentence in its April 30, 2015 decision on page 7, lines 19-21 under subtitle “Major Personnel Changes at PRC: July-September 2009:” “On September 1, 2009, PRC’s Chief Counsel, Michael Ravnitzky, forwarded an email to Chairman Goldway that he had received from Meyer Group’s Mr. Rayborn about a possible property tour. Tr. 204:4-5 (Gold-way); JX 89.” The Court replaces “PRC’s Chief Counsel, Michael Ravnitzky” with “Chairman Goldway’s Chief Counsel.” The revised sentence reads as follows: “On September 1, 2009, Chairman Goldway’s Chief Counsel forwarded an email to Chairman Goldway that he had received from Meyer Group’s Mr. Rayborn about a possible property tour. Tr. 204:4-5 (Goldway); JX 89.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.