Buck v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-0231V
Filed: April 21, 2015
**************************** JEAN L. BUCK, *
* Petitioners, *
v. * Statute of Limitations;
* Untimely Filing; Influenza Vaccine; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Guillain Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
* Respondent. *
* **************************** Carol Gallagher, Esq., Linwood, NJ, for petitioner.
Jennifer Reynaud, Esq., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION1 Vowell, Chief Special Master:
On March 6, 2015, petitioner filed a claim for compensation pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program [“Vaccine Program” or “the Program”].2 Petitioner alleges that she suffered Guillain Barre Syndrome [“GBS”] that was caused- in-fact by her influenza [“flu”] vaccination administered on November 26, 2010. Petition at ¶10. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit [“SPU”] of the Office of Special Masters.
A telephonic status conference was held on March 31, 2015. Carol Gallagher appeared on behalf of petitioner, and Jennifer Reynaud appeared on behalf of respondent.
Petitioner’s counsel indicated that after discussions with respondent’s counsel, and her own additional research, she has concluded that the Afluria vaccination petitioner received on November 26, 2010 is a trivalent influenza vaccination, and as such this claim filed on March 6, 2015 is outside the Vaccine’s Act’s statute of limitations. 42 U.S.C. § 300 aa-16(a)(2).3 Petitioner’s counsel indicated that petitioner does not intend to pursue her petition for compensation in this claim.
On April 1, 2015 I ordered petitioner to show cause why this case should not be dismissed as untimely filed by no later April 10, 2015. Petitioner did not respond to my Order.
Petitioner has the burden to show timely filing. Petitioner concedes this claim was not filed within “36 months after the date of the occurrence of the first symptom or manifestation of onset or of the significant aggravation of such injury” as required by the Vaccine Act. § 16(a)(2). Thus, this claim is dismissed as untimely filed under the Vaccine Act’s statute of limitations. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Chief Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.