Zalewski v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 14-124V
Filed: May 15, 2015 *************************** UNPUBLISHED SUSAN ZALEWSKI, * * Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman Petitioner, * v. * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; Reasonable Amount * Requested to which Respondent Does Not SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Object.
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * *
Respondent. * ***************************
Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner.
Traci R. Patton, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION1
On February 12, 2014, Susan Zalewski (“Petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that she suffered from a neuropathy as a result of a tetanus toxoid-diphtheria vaccine administered to her on August 23, 2012. Petition (“Pet”) at 1-2.
The undersigned issued a decision on April 3, 2014, dismissing the case for insufficient proof. On May 14, 2015, Petitioner filed a Stipulation of Facts Concerning Final Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. Stipulation, ECF No. 30. Pursuant to their Stipulation, the parties have agreed to an award of $17,974.48 in attorneys’ fees and costs. Id. In accordance with General Order Number 9, Petitioner’s counsel represented that Petitioner did not personally incur any expenses in pursuit of this claim. Id. The undersigned finds that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and appropriate.
Accordingly, the undersigned hereby awards the following amounts: a. $6,474.48, jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s attorney, Paul Brazil, Esq., for attorneys’ fees and costs; and b. $11,500.00, jointly payable to Petitioner and Thomas Gallagher, Esq., LLC, for attorneys’ fees and costs.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.