Wiley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-0141V
Filed: June 16, 2015
Unpublished
**************************** BRIDGETTE WILEY, *
*
Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; v. * Influenza or Flu Vaccine; Shoulder
* Injury Related to Vaccine Administration SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”)
*
Respondent. *
*
**************************** Jeffrey S. Pop, Esq., Jeffrey S. Pop, Attorney at Law, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner. Christine M. Becer, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
Vowell, Chief Special Master:
On February 11, 2015, Bridgette Wiley filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered an adverse reaction to the influenza vaccine she received on November 21, 2012 resulting in severe pain and several surgeries. Petition, ¶¶ 4, 39. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On June 15, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she “recommends that compensation be awarded in this case.” Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “has concluded that a preponderance of evidence establishes that the injury to petitioner’s right shoulder was caused-in-fact by the administration of her November 21, 2012, flu vaccine, and that petitioner’s injury is not due to factors unrelated to the administration of the flu vaccine.” Id. at 3-4. Furthermore, respondent agrees that petitioner’s injury lasted for more than six months. Id. at 4.
In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that petitioner is entitled to compensation. s/Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Chief Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.