Verdick v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-1039V Filed: June 25, 2015 Unpublished **************************** BARBARA VERDICK, * * Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages; * Influenza Vaccine or Flu Vaccine; * Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”); SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”); AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * **************************** John Howie, Jr., Esq., Howie Law, P.C., Dallas, TX, for petitioner.

Alexis Babcock, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 Vowell, Chief Special Master: On October 27, 2014, Barbara Verdick filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) resulting from the influenza vaccine she received on October 17, 2011. Petition at 1, ¶ 19; Stipulation, filed June 25, 2015, ¶¶ 2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of GBS for more than six months and continues to suffer the effects of her injury. Petition, ¶¶ 17-18; Stipulation, ¶ 4.

Respondent denies that the influenza vaccination caused petitioner’s GBS or any other injury. Stipulation, ¶ 6.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2006).

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. Stipulation, ¶ 7. On June 25, 2015, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

Respondent agrees to pay petitioner a lump sum of $125,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Barbara Verdick. Stipulation, ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

Id. I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 s/Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

Case 1:14-vv-01039-UNJ Document 26 Filed 06/25/15 Page 1 of 5 Case 1:14-vv-01039-UNJ Document 26 Filed 06/25/15 Page 2 of 5 Case 1:14-vv-01039-UNJ Document 26 Filed 06/25/15 Page 3 of 5 Case 1:14-vv-01039-UNJ Document 26 Filed 06/25/15 Page 4 of 5 Case 1:14-vv-01039-UNJ Document 26 Filed 06/25/15 Page 5 of 5