United States Court of Federal Claims, 2015

Vancleave v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided August 26, 2015 · Denise Kathryn Vowell

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-0019V

Filed: July 29, 2015

Unpublished

**************************** ERICA VANCLEAVE, *

Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages;

* Influenza (“flu”) Vaccine; Infection, * Sepsis, and Resulting Neurological

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Injuries in Shoulder and Arm; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

Respondent. *

**************************** John Howie, Jr., Howie Law, Dallas, TX, for petitioner.

Alexis Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

On January 8, 2015, Erica VanCleave filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Ms. VanCleave alleges that she suffered infection, sepsis, and resulting neurological injuries in her shoulder and arm resulting from the influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on November 11, 2013. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed July 28, 2015, at ¶¶ 2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months. Petition at 4; Stipulation at ¶ 4. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury or any other injury or condition. Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. Stipulation at ¶ 7. On July 28, 2015, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

Respondent agrees to pay petitioner a lump sum of $30,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 s/Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Chief Special Master

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.