United States Court of Federal Claims, 2015

Emir-Dubose v. United States

Emir-Dubose v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided September 10, 2015 · Victor J. Wolski
Emir-Dubose v. United States

Opinion

ORlGINAL 3m the fifinitth flaw QEuurt of erheral Qtlaimg No. 15-709C (Filed September 10, 2015) NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***********‘k****** 9: * U.S.COURTOF DEBORAH DENISE FEDERAL CLAIM EMIR-DUBOSE, * s * Plaintiff, * ‘k v. * *1: THE UNITED STATES, * ‘1: Defendant. * * *******‘k********** ORDER Despite being ordered to do so, plaintiff has failed to properly file a complaint in the above-captioned case. On July 22, 2015, the Court issued an order that noted plaintiffs failure to include her signature in her original complaint pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). See Order (July 22, 2015). Accordingly, the Court gave plaintiff until August 7, 2015, to file a proper complaint containing her signature. Several days later, plaintiff submitted what appeared to be an amended complaint, but which likewise failed to comply with numerous court rules (including the requirement of a signature) and thus was returned to plaintiff unfiled. See Order (July 29, 2015).

Because plaintiff did not file a complaint containing her signature by the August 7, 2015 deadline, this matter is accordingly DISMISSED for failure to prosecute under RCFC 41(b). The Clerk shall close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.