United States Court of Federal Claims, 2015

Dillson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Dillson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided September 18, 2015 · Denise Kathryn Vowell
Dillson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-959V Filed: August 21, 2015

Unpublished **************************** AMY LEE DILLSON, *

*

Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer;

* Influenza; Shoulder Injury (“SIRVA”) * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

**************************** Danny Ray Ellis, Massey & Associates, P.C., Chattanooga, TN, for petitioner. Alexis Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

On October 8, 2014, Amy Dillson filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury caused by an October 10, 2012 influenza vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 21, 2015, I issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for her shoulder injury which respondent conceded was a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). On August 21, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation [“Proffer”] indicating petitioner should be awarded $70,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering.3 Proffer at 1.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner a lump sum payment of $70,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Amy Dillson. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4 s/Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Chief Special Master

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

__________________________________________

)

AMY DILLSON, )

)

Petitioner, )

) No. 14-959 v. ) Chief Special Master Vowell

)

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, )

)

Respondent. )

__________________________________________)

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Items of Compensation

For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine-related” is as described in Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report filed on May 25, 2015.

A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $70,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses Petitioner has not submitted documentation for unreimbursed expenses in this case, and thus respondent proffers that petitioner should not be awarded any amount for unreimbursed expenses. Petitioner agrees.

C. Lost Wages The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, petitioner’s vaccine-related injury has not impaired her earning capacity. Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded no lost future earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $70,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.

Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General RUPA BHATTACHARYYA Director Torts Branch, Civil Division VINCENT J. MATANOSKI Deputy Director Tort Branch, Civil Division MICHAEL P. MILMOE Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ Alexis B. Babcock ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146

Dated: August 21, 2015 Telephone: (202) 616-7678

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). 3 I note that the proffer is mis-captioned to the extent that it refers to “Amy Dillson” rather than “Amy Lee Dillson” as above. 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.