United States Court of Federal Claims, 2015

Hawkins v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided November 13, 2015 · Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-708V Filed: October 21, 2015

************************* UNPUBLISHED MELODY HAWKINS, parent and * natural guardian of T.H., a minor, *

* Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman Petitioner, *

v. * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; Reasonable

* Amount Requested to which Respondent SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Does Not Object.

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

Respondent. *

************************* John Robert Howie, Jr., Howie Law, P.C., Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Ann Martin, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION 1 On August 5, 2014, Melody Hawkins (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation on behalf of her daughter, T.H., under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq. (2006) (“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that, as a result of the administration of Tetanus-Diphtheria-acellular-Pertussis (“TDaP”), Hepatitis A (“Hep A”), Varicella, and Gardasil (“HPV”) vaccinations on August 4, 2011, T.H. suffered from encephalopathy and lower extremity weakness. On July 30, 2015, the undersigned dismissed Petitioner’s case under Vaccine Rule 21(a).

On October 21, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Fact Concerning Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. Pursuant to their stipulation, the parties have agreed to an award of $17,616.67 in attorneys’ fees and costs. In accordance with General Order #9, Petitioner’s counsel represents that Petitioner has not incurred any costs in pursuit of her claim.

The undersigned finds that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby awards the amount of $17,616.67, in the form of a check made payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, John R. Howie, Jr.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman Special Master

1 The undersigned intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107 347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to file a motion for redaction “of any information furnished by that party (1) that is trade secret or commercial or financial information and is privileged or confidential, or (2) that are medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” In the absence of such motion, the entire decision will be available to the public. Id. 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.