United States Court of Federal Claims, 2016

Long v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Long v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided May 10, 2016 · Nora Beth Dorsey
Long v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-676V Filed: March 9, 2016 **************************** SHARON LONG, * * Petitioner, * Stipulation; Shoulder Injury (“SIRVA”); v. * Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis * (“Tdap”); Special Processing Unit (SPU); Awarding Damages; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorney Fees and Costs AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * **************************** Jeffrey Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA for petitioner.

Debra Filteau Begley, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1 Dorsey, Special Master: On June 30, 2015, Sharon Long (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq, 2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleged that, as a result of receiving a Tetanus diphtheria and acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination on May 6, 2014, she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) and experienced residual effects lasting for more than six months. (See Stipulation for Award, filed March

Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, it will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006).

8, 2016, ¶¶ 1-4 (ECF No. 19).) Respondent denies that petitioner experienced the residual effects of her SIRVA injury for more than six months. (Id., ¶. 6.)

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On March 8, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

Respondent agrees to pay petitioner: a. A lump sum of $50,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a); and b. A lump sum of $14,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Jeffrey S. Pop, of Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, for attorneys’ fees and costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). (Id, ¶ 8.)

In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner’s counsel has represented that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket litigation expenses. (Id, ¶ 8.)

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. 3 In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). I find the proposed amount to be reasonable.

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.