United States Court of Federal Claims, 2016

Swanson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Swanson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided October 11, 2016 · Laura D Millman
Swanson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-558V Filed: September 13, 2016 Not for Publication

************************************* LORRAINE SWANSON, * * Petitioner, * * Damages decision based on a v. * stipulation; influenza (“flu”) * vaccine; Guillain-Barré syndrome SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“GBS”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ************************************* Ronald C. Homer, Boston, MA, for petitioner.

Amy P. Kokot, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 On September 13, 2016, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that her receipt of influenza (“flu”) vaccine on December 20, 2012 caused her to develop Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”).

She further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

Respondent denies that petitioner’s flu vaccine caused her to develop GBS, any other injury, or her current condition. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally.

The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court adopts the Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access. parties’ attached stipulation and awards compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth in the stipulation. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards: a. a lump sum of $250,000.00 representing compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). The award shall be in the form of a check payable to petitioner in the amount of $250,000.00; and b. a lump sum of $45,178.74, representing reimbursement of a State of New York Medicaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and: New York City Division of Liens and Recovery P.O. Box 414799 Boston, MA 02241 Attn: Ms. Emily Eichblatt CIN: MV97967T Case Number: 708807 Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to the New York City Division of Liens and Recovery.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 13, 2016 s/ Laura D. Millman Laura D. Millman Special Master

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.