United States Court of Federal Claims, 2016

Favor Techconsulting, LLC v. United States

Favor Techconsulting, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided October 24, 2016 · Susan G. Braden
128 Fed. Cl. 392; 2016 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1571; 2016 WL 6246443
Favor Techconsulting, LLC v. United States

Opinion

EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge

On October 19, 2016, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”), temporarily restraining performance of the three Blanket Purchase Agreements (“BPAs”) currently under protest at the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) until October 26, 2016. In the October 19, 2016 Memorandum Opinion, the court instructed the Government to provide documentation demonstrating that the award of the contracts was on September 26, 2016, as opposed to September 27, 2016.

On October 24, 2016, the court convened a telephone Status Conference to discuss the status of the Government’s filing. During the Status Conference, counsel for the Government stated that the Government would make its filing on October 24, 2016. This filing constitutes a Response to Plaintiffs October 19, 2016 Motion For A Temporary Restraining Order. Under the Rules of The United States Court of Federal Claims, a Reply to Response must be filed within 7 days after service of the Response. See RCFC 7.2(a)(2). Therefore, Plaintiffs Reply will be due October 31, 2016.

Pursuant to the October 24, 2016 telephone Status Conference, the October 19, 2016 TRO is extended for the time provided for Plaintiff to Reply to the Government’s Response, plus 3 days. The October 19, 2016 TRO is there *393 fore extended for 10 days until November 3, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.