Williamson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-384V Filed: July 14, 2017 Not for Publication
************************************* DEBORAH M. WILLIAMSON, *
* *
Petitioner, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision;
* reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs v. *
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
************************************* Jeffrey A. Golvash, Pittsburgh, PA, for petitioner.
Adriana Teitel, Washington, DC, for respondent.
MILLMAN, Special Master
DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1 On March 25, 2016, petitioner filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10–34 (2012) alleging that her receipt of Tetanus-Diphtheria- acellular Pertussis vaccine on October 7, 2013 significantly aggravated her preexisting Sjogren’s syndrome and/or Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease. On May 15, 2017, the undersigned issued a decision awarding damages to petitioner based on the parties’ stipulation.
On June 27, 2017, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $25,732.00 and attorneys’ costs in the amount of $1,540.97, for a total request of $27,272.97. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner filed a statement signed by petitioner saying she did not advance any costs in pursuit of his claim.
On July 14, 2017, respondent filed a response to petitioner’s motion explaining he is satisfied that this case meets the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(1)(A)-(B). Resp. at 2. Respondent “respectfully recommends that the [undersigned] exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys’ fees and costs.” Id. at 3.
The Vaccine Act permits an award of “reasonable attorneys’ fees” and “other costs.” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(1). It is not necessary for a petitioner to prevail in the case-in-chief in order to receive a fee award as long as petitioner brought the claim in “good faith and there was a reasonable basis for the claim.” Id. The special master has “wide discretion in determining the reasonableness” of attorneys’ fees and costs. Perreira v. Sec’y of HHS, 27 Fed. Cl. 29, 34 (1992), aff’d, 33 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 1994); see also Saxton ex rel. Saxton v. Sec’y of HHS, 3 F.3d 1517, 1519 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (“Vaccine program special masters are also entitled to use their prior experience in reviewing fee applications.”).
Based on her experience and review of the billing records submitted by petitioner, the undersigned finds petitioner’s attorneys’ fees and costs request reasonable. Therefore, the undersigned GRANTS petitioner’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs.
Accordingly, the court awards $27,272.97, representing attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a check made payable jointly to petitioner and Brennan, Robins & Daley, P.C. in the amount of $27,272.97.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 14, 2017 s/ Laura D. Millman
Laura D. Millman Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.