United States Court of Federal Claims, 2017

Stahl v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided August 17, 2017

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-1204V (not to be published) *************************

FREDERICK STAHL, * * Special Master Corcoran *

Petitioner, * Filed: July 10, 2017 * v. * Decision; Attorney’s Fees and Costs; * Influenza (“flu”) Vaccine; Tetanus- * Diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * Bell’s Palsy.

HUMAN SERVICES, * *

Respondent. * * *************************

Alison H. Haskins, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner.

Christine M. Becer, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS DECISION1

On September 27, 2016, Frederick Stahl filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Program”).2 Petitioner alleged that he suffered from Bell’s palsy as a result of his November 12, 2015, receipt of the influenza (“flu”) and Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular-pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccines. The parties filed a stipulation for damages on June 28, 2017 (ECF No. 16), which I adopted by decision that same day. ECF No. 17.

Petitioner has now filed a motion requesting final attorney’s fees and costs, dated July 7, 2017. See ECF No. 20. Petitioner requests reimbursement of attorney’s fees and costs in the combined amount of $15,759.26 (representing $15,156.40 in attorney’s fees, plus $608.86 in costs). Id. Petitioner stated in his motion that Respondent has no objection to the overall amount sought by Petitioner. Id. In accordance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner also represented that he did not incur any personal litigation expenses in conjunction with this proceeding.

I approve the requested amount for attorney’s fees and costs as reasonable. Accordingly, an award of $15,759.26 should be made in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Alison H. Haskins, Esq. of Maglio, Christopher, and Toale. Payment of this amount represents all attorney’s fees and costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of Petitioner’s motion.3

IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Special Master

1 Although this Ruling has been formally designated “not to be published,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’s website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the Ruling in its present form will be available. Id. 2 The Vaccine Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3758, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 through 34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by each filing (either jointly or separately) a notice renouncing their right to seek review.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.