United States Court of Federal Claims, 2018

Ruth v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Ruth v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided January 15, 2018 · Christian J. Moran
Ruth v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ******************** * MARIXSA RUTH, * * No. 15-855V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: December 13, 2017 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Attorneys’ fees and costs; waiver * Respondent. * ******************** * Isaiah R. Kalinowski, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for Petitioner; Camille M. Collett, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1 After receiving compensation through the Vaccine Program, Marixsa Ruth filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. Ms. Ruth is awarded the full amount of her request, $42,202.24.

* * * Ms. Ruth alleged that an influenza vaccination caused her to suffer from acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. The parties agreed to a stipulation resolving the amount of compensation. The stipulation was incorporated into a decision The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4).

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. awarding Ms. Ruth’s compensation. Decision, issued May 2, 2017, 2017 WL 2334968. With the merits of Ms. Ruth’s case resolved, the parties addressed attorneys’ fees and costs.

Ms. Ruth filed an attorneys’ fees and costs petition on August 16, 2017, requesting $39,115.10 in fees and $3,087.14 in costs. Ms. Ruth did not incur any costs personally. Exhibit 18 (General Order No. 9 statement).

The Secretary filed a response representing that he “is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case.”

Resp’t’s Resp., filed Aug. 28, 2017, at 2. The Secretary did not raise any specific objections and recommended that the Special Master “exercise his discretion” when determining a reasonable award. Id. at 3.

Ms. Ruth filed a reply on August 29, 2017, reaffirming her request for attorneys’ fees and costs. Ms. Ruth also argued in her reply that the Secretary’s position of not presenting any specific objections and deferring to the Special Master’s discretion was overly burdensome on petitioners and Special Masters.

This matter is now ripe for adjudication.

* * * Because Ms. Ruth received compensation, she is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa–15(e).

Pursuant to the rationale established in Swintosky v. Secʼy of Health & Human Servs., No. 12-403V, 2017 WL 5899239 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Nov. 6, 2017), 2 the Secretary has waived any objections to the amount of fees requested.

Absent any objections, Ms. Ruth’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs is GRANTED IN FULL: A lump sum of $42,202.24 in the form of a check made payable to petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Isaiah R. Kalinowski.

These amounts represents reimbursement attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). In the absence of a motion for In Swintosky, the parties submitted a joint notice of decision not to seek review of the Fees Decision. review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.