United States Court of Federal Claims, 2018

Hagans v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Hagans v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided January 31, 2018 · Nora Beth Dorsey
Hagans v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

Case 1:16-vv-01068-UNJ Document 27 Filed 08/28/17 Page 1 of 2

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1068V Filed: August 28, 2017 UNPUBLISHED

LINDA HAGANS, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Petitioner, Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; v. Causation-In-Fact; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.

Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On August 26, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she received an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on October 29, 2015 and subsequently suffered a shoulder injury. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On August 21, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent believes petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a SIRVA Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that, based on the record as it not stands,

Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

Case 1:16-vv-01068-UNJ Document 27 Filed 08/28/17 Page 2 of 2

petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act.

Id. In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.